// contracts/identity.capability.ts
export interface IdentityCapability {
  reserveEmail(email: string): Promise<OperationResult<UserId, IdentityError>>;
  persistProfile(data: UserProfilePayload): Promise<OperationResult<UserRecord, IdentityError>>;
}

// contracts/risk.capability.ts
export interface RiskCapability {
  evaluateDevice(deviceId: string): Promise<OperationResult<DeviceScore, RiskError>>;
  validateNetwork(ip: string): Promise<OperationResult<NetworkStatus, RiskError>>;
}

// contracts/referral.capability.ts
export interface ReferralCapability {
  resolveCode(code: string): Promise<OperationResult<ReferralLink, ReferralError>>;
  linkAccounts(referrerId: UserId, newUserId: UserId): Promise<OperationResult<ReferralRecord, ReferralError>>;
}

// workflows/registration.workflow.ts
import { OperationResult, ok, err } from '../shared/result';

export class RegistrationWorkflow {
  constructor(
    private readonly identity: IdentityCapability,
    private readonly risk: RiskCapability,
    private readonly referral: ReferralCapability,
    private readonly analytics: AnalyticsCapability,
  ) {}

  async execute(payload: RegistrationRequest): Promise<OperationResult<RegistrationResponse, WorkflowError>> {
    // 1. Risk evaluation (read-only, no transaction needed)
    const deviceCheck = await this.risk.evaluateDevice(payload.deviceId);
    if (deviceCheck.isFailure()) return err(WorkflowError.RISK_CHECK_FAILED);

    const networkCheck = await this.risk.validateNetwork(payload.ip);
    if (networkCheck.isFailure()) return err(WorkflowError.RISK_CHECK_FAILED);

    // 2. Referral resolution (read-only)
    let referralLink: ReferralLink | null = null;
    if (payload.referralCode) {
      const linkResult = await this.referral.resolveCode(payload.referralCode);
      if (linkResult.isFailure()) return err(WorkflowError.INVALID_REFERRAL);
      referralLink = linkResult.value;
    }

    // 

3. Transactional boundary: identity creation + referral linking const txResult = await this.identity.reserveEmail(payload.email); if (txResult.isFailure()) return err(WorkflowError.EMAIL_TAKEN);

   const userRecord = await this.identity.persistProfile({ email: payload.email, hashedPassword: payload.passwordHash, source: payload.adSource, riskProfile: { ip: payload.ip, deviceId: payload.deviceId }, });

   if (userRecord.isFailure()) return err(WorkflowError.PERSISTENCE_FAILED); const newUser = userRecord.value;

   // 4. Post-creation side effects (idempotent, fire-and-forget safe) if (referralLink) { await this.referral.linkAccounts(referralLink.ownerId, newUser.id); }

   await this.analytics.trackEvent('user.registered', { userId: newUser.id, source: payload.adSource, riskScore: deviceCheck.value.score, });

   return ok({ userId: newUser.id, email: newUser.email }); } }

### Step 3: Map Workflow Errors at the Transport Boundary
The workflow returns explicit results. The controller or NestJS interceptor translates them to HTTP responses. This keeps business logic free from transport concerns.

```typescript
// adapters/http/registration.controller.ts
@Controller('auth')
export class RegistrationController {
  constructor(private readonly workflow: RegistrationWorkflow) {}

  @Post('register')
  async handle(@Body() payload: RegistrationRequest): Promise<ApiResponse> {
    const result = await this.workflow.execute(payload);

    if (result.isSuccess()) {
      return { status: 201, data: result.value };
    }

    const errorMap: Record<WorkflowError, number> = {
      [WorkflowError.EMAIL_TAKEN]: 409,
      [WorkflowError.INVALID_REFERRAL]: 400,
      [WorkflowError.RISK_CHECK_FAILED]: 403,
      [WorkflowError.PERSISTENCE_FAILED]: 500,
    };

    const httpStatus = errorMap[result.error] ?? 500;
    throw new HttpException(result.error, httpStatus);
  }
}

Architecture Decisions & Rationale

• Capabilities over Services: Capabilities define intent (reserveEmail, evaluateDevice) rather than implementation details. This prevents domain leakage and makes mocking trivial.
• Explicit Transaction Boundaries: The workflow identifies where ACID guarantees are required (user creation + referral linking) and isolates them. Read-only steps run outside the transaction, reducing lock contention.
• Result Pattern at Boundaries: Using OperationResult<T, E> forces explicit error handling. The compiler prevents silent failures, and the workflow remains pure business logic.
• Idempotent Side Effects: Analytics and bonus accrual are decoupled from the core transaction. If they fail, the user is still created. This matches production reality where observability shouldn't block core flows.

Pitfall Guide

1. The Orchestrator God Object

Explanation: The orchestrator accumulates conditional logic, error mapping, and execution order knowledge. It becomes the single point of failure for refactoring. Fix: Extract execution order into a workflow handler. Use a step-based pipeline or explicit state machine. Keep the orchestrator thin or eliminate it entirely.

2. Implicit Transaction Boundaries

Explanation: Developers assume each service manages its own transaction. Cross-service flows end up with partial commits when intermediate steps fail. Fix: Define transaction scope at the workflow level. Use database transactions explicitly (BEGIN/COMMIT/ROLLBACK) or leverage NestJS transactional decorators that span multiple capability calls.

3. Capability Leakage

Explanation: Extracted services reach into each other's data or call internal methods not exposed in the contract. This recreates coupling under a new name. Fix: Enforce strict interface boundaries. Use dependency injection to inject only the capability contract, not the concrete implementation. Run static analysis to detect cross-module imports.

4. Error Handling Fragmentation

Explanation: Mixing throw, Result, and null returns creates inconsistent error paths. The orchestrator spends more time translating errors than executing logic. Fix: Standardize on a single error representation across the feature boundary. Use discriminated unions or a Result monad. Map to HTTP status codes only at the transport layer.

5. Testing the Wiring, Not the Flow

Explanation: Unit tests mock every service and verify the orchestrator calls them in order. This tests implementation details, not business behavior. Fix: Write behavior-driven tests against the workflow. Provide fake capability implementations that return predefined results. Assert on final state and side effects, not call counts.

6. Ignoring Idempotency in Distributed Steps

Explanation: Retry mechanisms or message queues cause duplicate execution. Without idempotency keys, bonuses are double-awarded or analytics are duplicated. Fix: Attach unique correlation IDs to workflow executions. Design side-effect capabilities to be idempotent by checking existing records before creating.

7. Over-Engineering with Premature Microservices

Explanation: Teams split services into separate deployables before the domain is stable. Network latency, distributed transactions, and versioning complexity explode. Fix: Keep capabilities in a single deployable unit until scaling demands otherwise. Use modular monolith patterns with clear bounded contexts. Split only when independent deployment velocity is proven necessary.

Production Bundle

Action Checklist

• Map feature boundaries: Identify which operations belong to the same business transaction
• Replace service calls with capability interfaces: Define intent-driven contracts
• Implement explicit workflow handler: Sequence steps, define transaction scope, handle errors
• Standardize error representation: Use Result<T, E> or discriminated unions across the feature
• Isolate side effects: Move analytics, notifications, and bonus accrual outside the core transaction
• Add idempotency keys: Ensure retries and queue consumers don't duplicate state changes
• Write workflow-level tests: Validate business behavior, not implementation wiring
• Review transaction boundaries: Confirm ACID guarantees match business requirements

Decision Matrix

Scenario	Recommended Approach	Why	Cost Impact
Single feature with 3–5 domain interactions	Explicit Workflow + Capabilities	Keeps transactional integrity, reduces coupling	Low (refactoring only)
Cross-feature events requiring async processing	Event-Driven Workflow + Message Queue	Decouples execution, enables scaling	Medium (infrastructure + serialization)
High-throughput registration with external risk APIs	Async Workflow + Retry + Idempotency	Handles latency, prevents duplicate state	Medium-High (queue + monitoring)
Legacy monolith with tight service coupling	Strangler Fig + Capability Wrappers	Gradual migration without rewrite	High (phased effort)

Configuration Template

// modules/registration/registration.module.ts
import { Module } from '@nestjs/common';
import { RegistrationWorkflow } from './workflows/registration.workflow';
import { IdentityCapability } from './contracts/identity.capability';
import { RiskCapability } from './contracts/risk.capability';
import { ReferralCapability } from './contracts/referral.capability';
import { AnalyticsCapability } from './contracts/analytics.capability';

import { IdentityRepository } from './infrastructure/identity.repository';
import { RiskEngineAdapter } from './infrastructure/risk.engine';
import { ReferralStore } from './infrastructure/referral.store';
import { AnalyticsTracker } from './infrastructure/analytics.tracker';

@Module({
  providers: [
    RegistrationWorkflow,
    { provide: IdentityCapability, useClass: IdentityRepository },
    { provide: RiskCapability, useClass: RiskEngineAdapter },
    { provide: ReferralCapability, useClass: ReferralStore },
    { provide: AnalyticsCapability, useClass: AnalyticsTracker },
  ],
  exports: [RegistrationWorkflow],
})
export class RegistrationModule {}

Quick Start Guide

1. Identify the feature boundary: List all operations triggered by a single user action (e.g., registration). Group them by transactional requirement.
2. Define capability contracts: Create interfaces that express intent, not implementation. Place them in a contracts/ directory.
3. Build the workflow handler: Implement a class that executes steps sequentially, manages transaction scope, and returns explicit results.
4. Wire dependencies: Register capabilities in your NestJS module. Inject the workflow into your controller or command handler.
5. Test the flow: Write integration tests using fake capability implementations. Verify final state, error mapping, and side-effect execution.